{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"CLTD","provider_url":"https:\/\/ctdj.ca\/en\/","author_name":"ctdj","author_url":"https:\/\/ctdj.ca\/en\/author\/ctdj\/","title":"Taylor v. The Attorney General of Canada - CLTD","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CFTrCNEnQa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ctdj.ca\/en\/jurisprudence\/taylor-v-the-attorney-general-of-canada\/\">Taylor v. The Attorney General of Canada<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/ctdj.ca\/en\/jurisprudence\/taylor-v-the-attorney-general-of-canada\/embed\/#?secret=CFTrCNEnQa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Taylor v. The Attorney General of Canada&#8221; &#8212; CLTD\" data-secret=\"CFTrCNEnQa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/ctdj.ca\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Recours collectifs \u0096 Proc\u00e9dure civile \u0096 Couronne \u0096 Appels &#8722; Expos\u00e9 de cause \u0096 Par motion, les parties sollicitent l'autorisation de faire d\u00e9cider une question par voie d'expos\u00e9 de cause \u0096 La demanderesse pr\u00e9tend que des implants temporo-mandibulaires lui ont caus\u00e9 un pr\u00e9judice \u0096 Elle poursuit le gouvernement en faisant valoir que Sant\u00e9 Canada s'est montr\u00e9 n\u00e9gligent dans l'exercice des fonctions que lui a confi\u00e9 la l\u00e9gislation pertinente \u0096 Les parties demandent \u00e0 passer outre \u00e0 la comp\u00e9tence de la Cour divisionnaire et \u00e0 faire trancher par la Cour d'appel, dans le cadre d'un expos\u00e9 de cause, la question des exigences auxquelles il faut satisfaire pour \u00e9tablir, entre les parties, une relation de proximit\u00e9 suffisante dans un tel contexte \u0096 L'autorisation est accord\u00e9e."}